Footfalls of a pair of feet are equally spaced in time
Bipedal Walk -- duty factor $> 0.5$ for each foot
Bipedal run – duty factor $< 0.5$
Quadruped Trot -- feet of diagonal limb pair fall synchronously; duty factor $\approx 0.5$
Pace -- feet of lateral limb pair fall synchronously; duty factor $\approx 0.5$
Asymmetrical gaits
Footfalls of a pair are not equally spaced in time
Gallop and canter
Half-bound
Full bound
Pronk
Figure t.b.d. (fig:tripod) is from Alexander 1992[Alexander92:_explor_biomec]
Human gaits
Biped gait can be considered as several states in two phases
Stance phase
IC = Initial contact, similar to HS = Heel strike
FF = Foot Flat
MS = Mid Stance (centre of gravity over the area of the foot)
HO = Heel Off
TO = Toe Off
Swing phase
SP = Swing
MS = Mid Stance
There is discussion as to the principles of human walking in particular do we walk to save energy or to avoid accelerating our head and body[kuo2007six]
half step while body weight moved ahead of static foot.
Problematic for some people with Parkinson's
Termination
CNS plans a shorter step
Presumably an inverted pendulum dynamic
Age and pathology determinates of gait
Gaits evidently change with age and with conditions such as cerebral palsy, muscular conditions such as SMA or MD, Parkinson's disease, stroke, orthopaedic difficulties, etc. For details see texts such as Whitaker, Perry etc.
Young gaits
Wider walking base (greater stability)
higher cadence, smaller stride length
Foot-flat grund contact
Less stance phase knee flexion
Less arm swinging
external rotatio at the hip (see Whittaker, and Sutherland 1988)
Parkinson's
Stride length and speed reduced (although increase when on L-Dopa)
Walking base increased
Range of motion of hip, knee and ankle reduced,
Arm swings reduced
Trunk rotates in phase with pelvis c.f. antiphase in more typical walking
Gait takes longer to stabilise (more than two or three steps)